Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Cooperation between Iran and Russia has expanded to unprecedented levels. Following the Russian offensive in Ukraine, their partnership has undergone a significant transformation, altering power dynamics and elevating Iran from a junior partner to an equal counterpart. Russia's dependence on Iran in unexpected areas has caught observers by surprise. In her book, Ghoncheh Tazmini presents a fresh analysis of the complex relationship between Russia and Iran. She argues for a Russia-Iran 'alignment' based on their shared narratives of the international order. The two states are bound by connective tissue that is coded by ontological security preoccupations and mutual threat perceptions. Despite historical animosities and ongoing suspicions, the relationship has demonstrated resilience, fluctuating between conflict and convergence. The Iran-Russia relationship holds decisive implications for the Middle East's future, where their interests both overlap and diverge, notably in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and with the GCC. Tazmini delves into Russian and Iranian geopolitical aspirations in the Middle Eastern theatre and addresses how evolving international realities impact their regional policies. Through a blend of sophisticated theoretical analysis and empirical insights, Tazmini explains why Moscow-Tehran relations are more durable than many in the Western world and the Middle East may perceive. Russia and Iran's close alignment is expected to persist – undeterred by criticism and sanctions, the 'Power Couple' remains determined to establish a foothold in the international system through their collaborative efforts.
World Affairs Online
In: International Library of Political Studies
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; I. Revolution and Modernisation: The Theoretical Context; Introduction: The Case for Comparing Russia and Iran; Ambivalence towards Western Modernity: To Be or Not to Be (like the West); Revolution; Modernisation; II. Historical Patterns of Modernisation from Above Impetus for Change: Sustaining the Russian; Impetus for Change: Sustaining the Russian Bear and the Iranian Lion; Peter the Great: Russia's First Modernising Autocrat; Alexander's Great Reforms; Rapid Reconstruction under Reza Shah; III. Modernising Romanov Russia and Pahlavi Iran.
In: International library of Iranian studies, 12
The man behind the movement -- The ideas behind reform -- The Khatami way -- From slogan to practice -- Khatami and the world -- Obstacles to reform -- Khatami's revolution and beyond
World Affairs Online
In: Third world quarterly, Band 42, Heft 6, S. 1295-1313
ISSN: 1360-2241
In: Third world quarterly, Band 39, Heft 10, S. 1998-2015
ISSN: 1360-2241
In: Third world quarterly, Band 39, Heft 10, S. 1998-2015
ISSN: 0143-6597
World Affairs Online
In: Review of Middle East studies, Band 51, Heft 2, S. 293-295
ISSN: 2329-3225
In: Iranian studies, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 271-292
ISSN: 1475-4819
In 2015, the quincentennial commemoration of the Portuguese arrival on the island of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf (1515–1622) revealed the underlying presupposition among Iranians that the Portuguese presence on the island was the harbinger of a long-term pattern of western imperialism. This analysis questions the accuracy of this narrative by advancing a new interpretative framework that does not reduce the holding of Hormuz to simply another dark episode of European colonial history. Circumscribed and limited in aim and reach, Lusitanian activities on Hormuz cannot be brought under the generic rubric of "orientalism," which is embedded in European colonial tradition, and which, by extension, buttresses Iranian nationalist sentiment about the Persian–Portuguese entanglement. This research demonstrates that Portuguese objectives diverged from the eighteenth and nineteenth century rationalist scientific traditions of the British, French and Germans professing a civilizing mission as a rationale for colonial policies. Whereas the Portuguese operated from a worldview that combined profit, dynastic pride and religious rhetoric, the Portuguese mission to Hormuz was not guided by a grand discourse of civilizing the "other." While there was a complex interplay of commercial interests and brutal methods on this strategic entrepôt, Portuguese ambitions in Hormuz were confined and elusive, and at best a matter of tribute-taking. The present paper charters some of these complex interactions.
In: Insight Turkey, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 206-208
ISSN: 1302-177X
In: Central'naja Azija i Kavkaz: žurnal social'no-političeskich issledovanij = Central Asia and the Caucasus, Heft 6/24, S. 157-162
ISSN: 1403-7068
World Affairs Online
In: Central Asian survey, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 63-83
ISSN: 1465-3354
In: Central Asian survey, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 63-84
ISSN: 0263-4937
World Affairs Online